Valence Operating Co. v. Texas Genco, LP
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BILL VANCE, Justice.
In this accommodation doctrine case, Appellee Texas Genco, LP sought a permanent injunction to prevent Appellant Valence Operating Co. from drilling Well No. 9 of its Holmes “A” Gas Unit 1 within cells 8 and 12 of Texas Genco’s ash-disposal landfill. Valence, which has mineral rights in the Holmes Unit, obtained a per mit from the Railroad Commission to drill Well 9 as a 297-foot directional well (referred to by the parties and in this opinion as the 300-foot directional well). The trial court entered a temporary injunction, and Valence counterclaimed for damages…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Maritime Overseas Corp. v. EllisTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Crown Life Insurance Company v. CasteelTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Harris County v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Key Operating & Equipment, Inc. v. Will Hegar and Loree Hegar, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
- Homer Merriman v. XTO Energy, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2011
- Key Operating & Equipment, Inc. v. Will Hegar and Loree Hegar, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
- Key Operating & Equipment, Inc. v. Will Hegar and Loree Hegar, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
- Key Operating & Equipment, Inc. v. Will Hegar and Loree Hegar, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013