Legal Opinion
United States v. Charlie W. Scott
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided March 22, 1993No. 92-7111PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge:
Defendant, Charlie Scott, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988). Scott claims inter alia that the district court violated Fed.R.Crim.P. 11 by failing to apprise him of the direct consequences of his guilty plea. Scott is also before this Court on direct appeal, arguing that he was convicted of merged and lesser included offenses. We agree with Scott’s Rule 11 argument, and therefore vacate his conviction and remand so that he may be given the opportunity to replead. We also agree with Scott’s…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ball v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Winston Eugene DaytonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- United States v. Samuel O. White, Luis Noel Cruz, AKA Danny CruzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Climmie Jones, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Rafael Eduardo Freyre-Lazaro, Orestes Miguel Diaz-Gonzalez, and Eufemio Ruben Llerena-AcostaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Merrick D. Myers, Also Known as Merrick MyersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. John McQuilkinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.