Legal Opinion

United States v. Rafael Eduardo Freyre-Lazaro, Orestes Miguel Diaz-Gonzalez, and Eufemio Ruben Llerena-Acosta

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided October 8, 1993No. 91-5646PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOBBS, Senior District Judge:

Appellants are three defendants who raise an assortment of challenges to their convictions for their roles in a conspiracy to purify contaminated cocaine. Defendants Orestes Miguel Diaz-Gonzalez, Eufemio Ruben Llerena-Acosta, and Rafael Eduardo Freyre-Lazaro were each indicted on four counts and tried together. The jury found all three guilty of Count I, possession with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2, and Count II, conspiracy to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. The jury convicted…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of HialeahSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. United States v. Alberto CalderonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  2. United States v. Augustin GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. Samuel O. White, Luis Noel Cruz, AKA Danny CruzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  4. State v. PhillipsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  5. United States v. Climmie Jones, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API