Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ex Parte Robey

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 1, 2006No. 1051454Published

1Dissent

I dissent from the majority's decision to deny this petition for a writ of certiorari because I believe that this Court needs to address the issue presented by the petition and clarify the law on subject-matter jurisdiction in criminal cases.

In 1992, William Keith Robey pleaded guilty to possession of a controlled substance. The trial court entered a judgment of conviction and imposed sentence. Robey did not appeal. In 2006, Robey filed a petition for postconviction relief, pursuant to Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim. P., in the circuit court claiming that the trial court was without jurisdiction to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Ex Parte SeymourSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  4. Lancaster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  5. Woolf v. McGaughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API