Ex Parte Seymour
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The issue presented in this case is whether a conviction is void for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction because the indictment charging the offense omitted an element of the offense. We hold that it is not.
I
On November 8, 2001, Christopher Jacques Seymour opened fire on a group of five men somewhere in Randolph County. One of the five, Kevin Turner, was shot in his leg below the knee. As Turner retreated into his house, the gunfire continued, and some of the bullets entered Turner's house. Turner's wife and three-year-old son were inside the house.
Seymour was convicted of second-degree…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Studer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Cooper v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- State v. ParkhurstSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Ford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by189 opinions
- State v. DunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
- Ex Parte WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- Sturdivant v. BAC Home Loans ServicingSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
- Ex Parte Safeway Ins. Co. of Alabama, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008
- DuBose v. WeaverSupreme Court of Alabama · 2011
184 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.