People v. Ramos

Memorandum. In light of the invulnerable finding that the witness Carmen Jiminez had ample opportunity to observe the defendant at the time of the burglary, we hold that her in-court identification of the defendant had an independent source and was not tainted by any suggestive identification at the station house (see People v Cobenais, 39 NY2d 968; People *835v Carter, 30 NY2d 279, 283; cf. Neil v Biggers, 409 US 188, 199-201).

We also reject the defendant’s claim, made at the Appellate Division and in this court, that the in-court identification by the witness Norma Jiminez was tainted by a…