Legal Opinion

State v. Bell

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided August 13, 1984No. 83-348PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The defendant appeals from his conviction by a jury in Superior Court (DiClerico, J.) on a charge of selling a controlled drug. RSA 318-B:2 (Supp. 1981). On appeal, the defendant claims numerous errors by the trial court. We are presented with the central question of whether, under RSA 318-B:2 (Supp. 1981), the identity of the person to whom an illegal sale is alleged to have been made is an element of the offense which must be alleged and proved. We find no errors and affirm the conviction.

The defendant was indicted in September, 1982, for selling, on April 1,1982, “to Trooper James B. Nims…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Adams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. Milton SilvermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  5. United States v. Marion Knuckles, Rose Smith and Raymond BrownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  2. State v. MayesTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. FarrowSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  4. State v. EricksonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  5. State v. PierceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API