Legal Opinion

State v. Garrow

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 3, 1995No. 94 CA 1PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grey, Judge.

This is an appeal from the Gallipolis Municipal Court. Appellant, Robert Garrow, was found guilty of violating Gallipolis Codified Ordinance 509.03, which prohibits disorderly conduct. Appellant assigns the following error:

“The trial court erred to the prejudice of the defendant/appellant in finding the appellant guilty of disorderly conduct after warning under the city of Gallipolis Codified Ordinance 509.03 since the appellant’s conviction was against the manifest weight of the evidence.”

The record reveals the following facts. On the evening of August 3, 1993, the Gallipolis…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. EskridgeOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. State v. Smith, Unpublished Decision (1-29-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. State v. Howard, Unpublished Decision (11-27-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. State v. PicklesimerOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. State v. MorrisOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 2010

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API