Legal Opinion

Nolan v. District Court, Second Judicial Dist.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 21, 1978No. 27653PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hodges

Petitioner Nolan seeks relief in the nature of mandamus and prohibition in this original proceeding against respondent district court which permitted Frances La Bue to intervene in a suit between petitioner Nolan and Jerry La Bue, the intervenor’s husband. The respondent district court also ordered petitioner Nolan to return funds garnisheed on his behalf to the registry of the court. We issued a rule to show cause why respondent district court’s orders should not be quashed. The parties have responded and we now hold that the orders of the respondent district court were proper. We therefore…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lucas v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  2. Calvat v. JuhanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  3. Boxwell v. Greeley Union National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
  4. Berry v. Westknit Originals, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  5. James v. JamesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Robbins v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  2. People v. RaelColorado Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. In re TrujilloUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2012
  4. Front Range Partners v. Hyland Hills Metropolitan Park & Recreation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  5. In Re SeayUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API