Legal Opinion
Front Range Partners v. Hyland Hills Metropolitan Park & Recreation District
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided September 30, 1985No. 83SA442PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSON, Justice.
The Front Range Partners (petitioners) appeal an order by the Adams County District Court denying their motion under C.R. C.P. 60(b) to set aside an order of the court reincluding their property in the Hyland Hills Metropolitan Park and Recreation District (Recreation District), respondent-appellee. We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion, and we affirm the district court.
I
In 1955 the District 50 Metropolitan Recreation District was organized. The name was changed to its present form in 1970. The property which is the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re the Marriage of StroudSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Dudley v. KellerColorado Court of Appeals · 1974
- Riss v. Air Rental, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1957
- Stanspec Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Jelco, Incorporated, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- Colorado Ground Water Commission v. DreilingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. McMillanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- First National Bank of Telluride v. FleisherSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Guevara v. FoxhovenColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
- Plaza Del Lago Townhomes Ass'n v. Highwood Builders, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- Herrera v. AndersonColorado Court of Appeals · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.