Legal Opinion

Max Ryant Jewelers No. 2, Inc. v. New York Telephone Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 13, 1980PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 15,1980, unanimously modified, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, the second cause of action in the complaint reinstated against defendant Holmes, with liability for damages, if any, limited to the sum of $1,116, and otherwise affirmed. There is a triable issue of fact as to whether defendant Holmes was negligent in the installation and maintenance of the electric security system in plaintiffs premises (see Rediscount Corp. of Amer. v Duke, 34 AD2d 898; see, also, Glick & Dolleck v Tri-Pak Export Corp., 22 NY2d…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gross v. SweetNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Glick & Dolleck, Inc. v. Tri-Pac Export Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Florence v. Merchants Central Alarm Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Rediscount Corp. of America v. DukeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dubovsky & Sons, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API