Legal Opinion
Florence v. Merchants Central Alarm Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 7, 1980PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
The contract provided that "The sole duty of the Contractor is to notify the Police Department and the Subscriber by calling on the telephone if a signal is received in the Central Station which might indicate illegal entry” (par 4) and that "the Contractor assumes no responsibility whatsoever for the *795condition of said Police Alarm transmitter or for any loss sustained by the Subscriber through burglary or through any other cause, during the period within which the contract is in force. It is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pimpinello v. Swift & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Gross v. SweetNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Ciofalo v. Vic Tanney Gyms, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Melodee Lane Lingerie Co. v. American District Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Howard v. Handler Bros. & Winell, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Sommer v. Federal Signal Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Da Silva v. MussoNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Abacus Federal Savings Bank v. ADT Security Services, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2012
- Calvin Klein Ltd. v. Trylon Trucking Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Noble Lowndes International, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.