Legal Opinion
Nissenbaum v. Farley
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 3, 1955No. Appeals, 176, 177 and 191PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mb. Justice Chidsey,
These are appeals from two orders of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County making absolute defendant’s rule to open a judgment with the issue limited to ascertainment of the proper amount thereof, and discharging plaintiff’s rule to allow execution on so much of the judgment allegedly admitted to be due.
On September 17, 1952, a chattel mortgage, postdated to September 22, 1952, covering certain grocery store equipment and fixtures was executed by the defendant, Andrew Parley, as mortgagor in favor of the plaintiff, Samuel C. Nissenbaum, trading as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Keystone Bank of Spangler v. BoothSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Blose v. MartensSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Commonwealth ex rel. Chidsey v. Keystone Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Sellers v. SellersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Gettier v. FridaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Mellon Bank Corporation and Mellon Bank, N.A., in No. 90-3712 v. First Union Real Estate Equity and Mortgage Investments, in No. 90-3790Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Giordano v. ClaudioDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Krause v. Great Lakes Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Laughlin v. McConnelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Albert J. Wood v. R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company and Donnelley ReceivablesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.