Legal Opinion

Keystone Bank of Spangler v. Booth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 27, 1939No. Appeal, 60PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey,

The court below, without making any findings of fact or filing an opinion, discharged defendant’s rule to open the judgment herein, after depositions in support of the rule had been taken. From this ruling defendant has appealed on the ground that the action of the court was an abuse of its discretion.

The facts which appear of record, and those which are not disputed by the parties, disclose the following situation. In 1923 Wetherson and his wife obtained a loan of $5,000 from the plaintiff, the Keystone Bank of Spangler, appellee in this court. The Wethersons gave…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Meek v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Schuy'l T. Co. v. Sobolewski Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Markofski v. YanksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Anderson v. Horst Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Bay City Bank v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Berkowitz v. KassSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Ahrens v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Nissenbaum v. FarleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Harrison v. StoeckertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Sterling Electric & Furniture Co. v. PetersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API