Legal Opinion
State v. Nobles
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided October 20, 1992No. 913SC627PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COZORT, Judge.
On 6 March 1990, Jimmy Ray Nobles was charged with refusing to allow an inspection of a licensed fish dealership, “West End Seafood,” in Greenville, North Carolina, pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 113-136(k). When defendant refused to allow two officers to in*628spect fish being sold on the premises, the officers subsequently obtained a search warrant and issued a misdemeanor citation to defendant for the refusal. The trial judge granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the charge on the grounds that § 113-136(k) allows unreasonable warrantless searches and seizures in violation of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- New York v. BurgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. BiswellSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. SteedCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- State v. McGillicuddySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Mary S. Vanderwoude Hill and James J. Hill v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006
- State v. NoblesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992