Tallman v. Department of Natural Resources
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtD. F. Walsh, P.J.
Following issuance of defendant Department of Natural Resources’s orders directing a 60-day suspension of their commercial fishing licenses, plaintiffs, Roger and Kirk Tail-man, Wayne Seaman and Gerald Casey, petitioned for judicial review in circuit court. MCL 24.301 et seq.; MSA 3.560(201) et seq. The suspensions were based on plaintiffs’ refusal to allow inspections without warrants, in open water, of their fishing vessels by state conservation officers. On the authority of People v Lansing Municipal Judge, 327 Mich 410; 42 NW2d 120 (1950), and Dep’t of Natural Resources v Seaman, 396 Mich…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Almeida-Sanchez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. BiswellSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tallman v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Attorney General v. HermesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983