Legal Opinion

H & R BLOCK, INC. v. Lovelace

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 22, 1972No. 46,182Published

1Opinion of the Court

208 Kan. 538 (1972)

493 P.2d 205

H & R BLOCK, INC., Appellant,

v.

EARL LOVELACE, Appellee.

No. 46,182

Supreme Court of Kansas.

Opinion filed January 22, 1972.

James M. Immel, of Immel and Immel of Iola, argued the cause and was on the briefs for the appellant.

J.D. Conderman, of Conderman and Talkington, of Iola, argued the cause and was on the brief for the appellee.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

HARMAN, C.:

This is an appeal by a plaintiff franchisor in an action brought by it to restrain an individual franchise from violating a covenant not to compete in the business of preparation of tax…

Also in this document: Dissent · Fontron; Dissent · Owsley.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Arthur Murray Dance Studios of Cleveland, Inc. v. WitterCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1952
  2. John Roane, Inc. v. TweedSupreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  3. Foltz v. StruxnessSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  4. Weiner v. Wilshire Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  5. H & R BLOCK, INC. v. LovelaceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API