Legal Opinion
Brunson v. City of Dayton
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided August 21, 2001No. C-3-00-293PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING, WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO RENEWAL, IN PART MOTION OF MATHIAS H. HECK, JR., TO QUASH SUBPOENA (DOC. #12); DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SEPARATE TRIALS (DOC. # 13); DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING DEFENDANTS’ PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. # 14); DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO BIFURCATE OR TO STAY DISCOVERY (DOC. #15); DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING, WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO RENEWAL, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY (DOC. # 18); PLAINTIFF GIVEN LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT; CONFERENCE CALL SET
RICE…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Paul Camiolo v. State Farm Fire And Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Nuovo v. the Ohio State UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
- Camiolo v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Clark v. Louisville Jefferson County Metro GovernmentDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2019
- Haislip v. Management and Training CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.