Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Clark v. Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided September 11, 2019No. 3:17-cv-00419Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-419-CRS-CHL JEFFREY DEWAYNE CLARK, et al., Plaintiffs, v. LOUISVILLE JEFFERSON COUNTY METRO GOVERNMENT, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court are the Motions to Quash filed by Defendant, Mark Handy (“Handy”), and Movant, Commonwealth of Kentucky (the “Commonwealth”). (DNs 84, 85.) Plaintiffs Clark and Hardin filed a response in opposition to the Motions (DN 87), and Handy filed a reply in support (DN 89). Therefore, this matter is ripe for review. For the reasons…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops NorthwestSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. Maurice RoseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  4. In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas 04-124-03 & 04-124-05Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  5. Socialist Workers Party, Cross-Appellants v. Joseph Grubisic, and Bernard Carey, Deponent-Appellant, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API