Legal Opinion

Ramme v. City of Madison

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1967PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

The issues on this appeal are two:

1. Does appellant have standing to attack the constitutionality of the statute?

2. Does the statute afford the landowner a type of review not available to others liable for the tax thereby constituting a denial of equal protection of the laws?

The pertinent statutory provisions are as follows:

“66.058 Mobile home parks. (1) Definitions. . . .
“(a) ‘Licensee’ means any person licensed to operate and maintain a mobile home park under this section.
“(b) . . .
“ (c) ‘Park’ means mobile home park.
“(d) . . .
“ (e) ‘Mobile home’ is that which is, or was as originally…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. F. Rosenberg Elevator Co. v. GollWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Boerschinger v. Elkay Enterprises, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Wisconsin Pharmaceutical Asso. v. LeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Barnes v. City of West AllisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Dean Milk Co. v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. PopenhagenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State Ex Rel. Sundby v. AdamanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Outagamie County v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Foley-Ciccantelli v. Bishop's Grove Condominium Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Village of Slinger v. City of HartfordCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API