Legal Opinion
Ramme v. City of Madison
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided November 28, 1967PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
The issues on this appeal are two:
1. Does appellant have standing to attack the constitutionality of the statute?
2. Does the statute afford the landowner a type of review not available to others liable for the tax thereby constituting a denial of equal protection of the laws?
The pertinent statutory provisions are as follows:
“66.058 Mobile home parks. (1) Definitions. . . .
“(a) ‘Licensee’ means any person licensed to operate and maintain a mobile home park under this section.
“(b) . . .
“ (c) ‘Park’ means mobile home park.
“(d) . . .
“ (e) ‘Mobile home’ is that which is, or was as originally…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- F. Rosenberg Elevator Co. v. GollWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Boerschinger v. Elkay Enterprises, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Wisconsin Pharmaceutical Asso. v. LeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Barnes v. City of West AllisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Dean Milk Co. v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. PopenhagenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
- State Ex Rel. Sundby v. AdamanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Outagamie County v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Foley-Ciccantelli v. Bishop's Grove Condominium Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
- Village of Slinger v. City of HartfordCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.