Legal Opinion
Village of Slinger v. City of Hartford
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided June 26, 2002No. 01-3016, 01-3281PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSnyder, J.
¶ 1. Dr. Kent and Mary Schaefer (the Schaefers) appeal from a summary judgment dismissing their claims against the City of Hartford (City) for lack of standing. The Schaefers argue that they have a legally protectible interest in the rezoning of adjoining property that impairs the quality of residential life and in protecting the Town of Hartford's (Town) right to test the validity of the City's annexation proceedings. We conclude that the Schaefers lack standing to bring this action.
¶ 2. The Town also appeals from an order dismissing its action against the City for failure to comply with…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ball v. District No. 4, Area BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- City of Madison v. Town of FitchburgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- State Department of Natural Resources v. City of WaukeshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
- Town of Madison v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Town of Eagle v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. PopenhagenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
- Foley-Ciccantelli v. Bishop's Grove Condominium Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
- Chenequa Land Conservancy, Inc. v. Village of HartlandCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
- Three T's Trucking v. KostCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
- Lake Country Racquet & Athletic Club, Inc. v. Village of HartlandCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.