Legal Opinion

Brown v. Anderson

California Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1888No. 11401PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Hayne, C.

Action to recover a balance due on a contract for the sale of fruit. The material portions of the contract were as follows: —

“I have sold to J. Z. Anderson of San José all the prunes and other fruits that may grow or be produced during the year 1884 upon about fifty acres of land purchased by me of A. G. Higgins, and situate in Santa Clara County, for the full sum or price of $2,666.23, payable as follows: $100 on this date, $900 on or before January 1, 1884, and the balance when the crop is taken off, at the end of the year.....I am to cultivate and take good care of the trees, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Knode v. BaldridgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Shoemaker v. AckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. J. L. Hammett Co. v. Alfred Peats Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Newman v. Borough of Fair LawnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  4. Earl Ranch, Ltd. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Williams v. BagnelleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API