Legal Opinion

Williams v. Bagnelle

California Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1903No. Sac. No. 1005PublishedCited by 15 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

From a judgment awarding plaintiff a peremptory writ of mandate against defendant, as superintendent of schools of Madera County, requiring her to draw a requisition in favor of plaintiff for a balance due him for salary as school-teacher, under a contract with the school trustees of Madera school district, the defendant appeals.

The school trustees had drawn their warrant in his favor for this balance, but defendant refused to issue a requisition upon it, and urges on this appeal, against the judgment,—1. That plaintiff is not entitled to invoke a writ of mandate, as he has a plain, speedy…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brown v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Aebli v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. Newman v. Borough of Fair LawnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  3. Gerritt v. Fullerton Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. United States v. Adolph G. Sutro, Adolph G. Sutro, Cross-Appellant v. United States of America, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  5. McKee v. Commission on Professional CompetenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API