Commonwealth v. Hamme
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
This appeal is from an order granting appellee’s motion to quash. Appellant, the Commonwealth, contends that the court below erred in suppressing certain evidence and granting the motion. For the following reasons, we agree, and accordingly, we reverse the order below and remand for trial.
The facts surrounding appellee’s arrest, viewed in the light most favorable to appellee, 1 are as follows. On October 27, 1989, Officer Hinds of the West Manchester Police Department was traveling through West York Borough when he observed a vehicle, driven by appellee, exiting a parking lot.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. CrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Commonwealth v. HicksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Commonwealth v. HamlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. BensonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GommerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Ankele v. HambrickDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. RaganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. ZiegelmeierSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.