Legal Opinion
Trinity Ambulance Service, Inc. v. G & L Ambulance Services, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided January 23, 1984No. Civ. H 82-969PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTIONS TO DISQUALIFY COUNSEL
JOSÉ A. CABRANES, District Judge:
This is an action challenging the method by which the City of Hartford directs requests for emergency ambulance services to private companies. Plaintiffs contend that the designation of two private firms as “sole providers” of emergency ambulance services within the city violates federal and state antitrust laws.
Plaintiff Trinity Ambulance Service, Inc. (“Trinity”) has filed a motion, supported by plaintiff Aetna Ambulance Service, Inc. (“Aetna”), requesting that counsel for Professional Ambulance Service, Inc.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- T. C. Theatre Corp. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- The Government of India and the Food Corporation of India v. Cook Industries, Inc. And Cook and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Michael F. Armstrong v. Clovis McAlpinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Silver Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corporation and Chrysler Realty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- In Re Yarn Processing Patent Validity Litigation. Celanese Corporation and Fiber Industries, Inc. v. Leesona Corporation, Lex Tex Ltd., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Alexander v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Bennett Silvershein Associates v. FurmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- First Hawaiian Bank v. Russell & Volkening, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Kempner v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Professional Service Industries, Inc. v. KimbrellDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.