Richard M. McQuestion v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc., Louis A. Hart v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WEIS, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal, we hold that under the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C. § 151 et seq., grievances arising from the discharges of two employees should be arbitrated by the National Railroad Adjustment Board. We conclude that, despite the absence of a formally ratified collective bargaining agreement, a de facto agreement existed and that the Adjustment Board erred in declining to exercise jurisdiction over the grievances. Accordingly, we will reverse the district court’s judgment sustaining the Adjustment Board’s position.
Police Officers Richard M.…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. BurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Andrews v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Union Pacific Railroad v. SheehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Detroit & Toledo Shore Line Railroad v. United Transportation UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bogen Communications, Inc. v. Tri-Signal Integration, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Keegan v. Steamfitters Local Union No. 420 Pension FundDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
- United Transportation Union v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Abudayyeh v. Envoy Air, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
- Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen v. CSX TransportationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.