Logical Minicomputers of Erie, Inc. v. Fox
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WEBER, District Judge.
Plaintiff alleges a cause of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendant in his individual capacity. Defendant is and was at all times relevant to this action a County Commissioner of Armstrong County, Pennsylvania. A county commissioner in Pennsylvania is a member of the three person board which constitutes the governing body, legislative and executive of a county. It is alleged that defendant’s actions described in the complaint were done under *820color of state law because of defendant’s position as County Commissioner. Jurisdiction is asserted under 28 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Balliet v. WhitmireDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1986