Legal Opinion

Logical Minicomputers of Erie, Inc. v. Fox

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 20, 1985No. Civ. A. No. 84-219 ERIEPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WEBER, District Judge.

Plaintiff alleges a cause of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendant in his individual capacity. Defendant is and was at all times relevant to this action a County Commissioner of Armstrong County, Pennsylvania. A county commissioner in Pennsylvania is a member of the three person board which constitutes the governing body, legislative and executive of a county. It is alleged that defendant’s actions described in the complaint were done under *820color of state law because of defendant’s position as County Commissioner. Jurisdiction is asserted under 28 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Balliet v. WhitmireDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API