Legal Opinion

United States v. Puerto Rico Indus. Dev. Co.

United States District Court

Decided May 31, 2019No. Civil No. 15-2328 (FAB)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BESOSA, District Judge.

*165Before the Court is the United States' motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 (" Rule 56"). (Docket No. 142.) The United States seeks to recover $ 5,398,161.04 from defendant Puerto Rico Industrial Development Company ("PRIDCO") pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act ("CERCLA"), 42 U.S.C. § 9607 et seq. Id. at p. 13. For the reasons set forth below, the United States' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED .

I. Background

This litigation concerns contaminated groundwater in Maunabo, Puerto…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Maldonado-Denis v. Castillo-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  5. Santiago-Ramos v. Centennial P.R. Wireless Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. PR Industrial Development Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API