Legal Opinion
Easby's Petition
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 27, 1936No. Appeal, 327PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Baldrige, J.,
The Act of 1927, April 27, P. L. 409, §§1, 2 (36 PS §§571, 572), provides that the secretary of highways is authorized, under certain conditions, to join two or more state highways by a connecting road, and any damage occasioned by the building thereof shall be “paid in the same manner as is now provided by law in the construction of State highways.”
The only question before us is: Do the words “as is now provided by law” mean that any damage occasioned by the construction of a connecting road between two state highways shall be 'determined and paid as provided by law at…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Guenthoer's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Merritt v. WhitlockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- Kugler's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1867
- Vernon ParkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
- Reinbold v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- West Penn Railways Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Governmental Research Bureau, Inc. v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Keating v. WhiteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Buckingham v. Fifth Judicial District Court of the StateNevada Supreme Court · 1940
- Easby's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.