Runyan v. Snyder
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from Weld District Court—Hon. James E. Garrigues, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell
The complaint has two causes of action, the object of the first being the recovery of possession of real estate of which plaintiff alleges ownership; the second the recovery of. damages for past, and to restrain threatened future, wrongful removal of improvements therefrom. As originally drawn the complaint named only William Runyan as a defendant. Before issues were joined, upon a proper showing by plaintiff, the court ordered Asa Runyan, the son of William, to be made a party defendant. Asa was duly served with process and appeared generally. William filed an answer in which his defense to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Weber v. LaidlerWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- McCue v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1864
- Brewster v. MaddenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
- Stark v. MorganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- Coffee v. EmighSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Strong v. StrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Ebel v. Ebel (In Re Ebel)District Court, D. Colorado · 1992
- Burnett v. TaylorWyoming Supreme Court · 1927
- Hitchens v. Milner Land, Coal & Townsite Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1919
- Bean v. EvesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.