Legal Opinion

Erie County Water Authority ex rel. Price Bros. v. Hen-Gar Construction Corp.

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided August 6, 1979No. Civ-78-463PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CURTIN, Chief Judge.

The designated plaintiff, Price Brothers Company [“Price Brothers”], instituted this contract action on August 2, 1978. Plaintiff alleges in its complaint that it entered into a contract with the Hen-Gar Construction Corporation [“Hen-Gar”] for the sale of pipe to Hen-Gar and that the defendant Hen-Gar has failed to pay $86,178.31 remaining on the purchase price of the pipe and $11,846.09 in accumulated service charges. Plaintiff also alleges in its complaint that defendant Aetna Casualty & Surety Company [“Aetna”] was the surety on a payment bond entered into by Hen-Gar…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  2. Austin Instrument, Inc. v. Loral Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. American Electric Power Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. Theda v. GiesowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  5. Jones & McKnight Corp. v. Birdsboro CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Roth Steel Products, and Toledo Steel Tube Company, Cross-Appellants v. Sharon Steel Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  2. Rubin v. Telemet America, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  3. ATO, INC. v. Stratton & Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1980
  4. ERIE COUNTY WATER AUTH., ETC. v. Hen-Gar Const.District Court, W.D. New York · 1979
  5. Roth Steel Products, and Toledo Steel Tube Company, Cross-Appellants v. Sharon Steel Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API