Legal Opinion
Roth Steel Products, and Toledo Steel Tube Company, Cross-Appellants v. Sharon Steel Corporation, Cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 8, 1983No. 80-3702, 80-3748Published
1Opinion of the Court
705 F.2d 134
35 UCC Rep.Serv. 1435
ROTH STEEL PRODUCTS, and Toledo Steel Tube Company,
Plaintiffs-Appellees, Cross-Appellants,
v.
SHARON STEEL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee.
Nos. 80-3702, 80-3748.
United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.
Argued Oct. 5, 1982.
Decided April 8, 1983.
B. Casey Yim/L.E. Oliphant, Jr., Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, James M. Porter (argued), Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue, Joseph G. Berick, R. Jeffery Pollock, Burke, Haber & Berick, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant-appellant, cross-appellee.
Sheldon Berns (argued), Michael H. Diamant, Kahn, Kleinman, Yanowitz &…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Roth Steel Products, and Toledo Steel Tube Company, Cross-Appellants v. Sharon Steel Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.