Legal Opinion

Dana Patterson, Inc. v. Town of Merrimack

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 10, 1988No. 87-097PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.

The plaintiff, Dana Patterson, Inc., appeals a decision of the Superior Court (Pappagianis, J.) granting defendant Town of Merrimack’s motion for summary judgment and upholding the town’s levy of a land use change tax under RSA 79-A:7 (Supp. 1987). We affirm.

*354In 1981 and 1983, the plaintiff purchased three adjoining tracts of land encompassing approximately 65 acres in Merrimack. One of the parcels, which contained about 25 acres, was under current use taxation, RSA ch. 79-A, at the time of purchase. The plaintiff in 1983 consolidated the three tracts as part of a subdivision plan, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Appeal of the Town of PeterboroughSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  2. Frost v. Town of CandiaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  3. Appeal of Town of HollisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  2. Formula Development Corp. v. Town of ChesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  3. Maplevale Builders, LLC v. Town of DanvilleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
  4. Foster v. Town of HennikerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  5. Formula Development Corp. v. Town of ChesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API