Formula Development Corp. v. Town of Chester
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.
The plaintiffs, Formula Development Corporation (Formula) and Clinton Realty Trust (Clinton), appeal the decision of the Superior Court (Morrill, J.) denying their petition for abatement of a land use change tax (LUCT), see RSA 79-A:7 (2003 & Supp. 2006), that was imposed by the defendant, Town of Chester (town). We reverse and remand.
The record supports the following. Clinton was the original owner of a thirty-acre parcel of property in Chester. In 2000, the town’s planning board granted subdivision approval for the development of a twenty-unit, single-family, condominium cluster…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pennelli v. Town of PelhamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- Appeal of Estate of Van LunenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
- Appeal of AndersonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- Dana Patterson, Inc. v. Town of MerrimackSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- State v. LeonardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
3Cited by7 opinions
- Garand v. Town of ExeterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- Maplevale Builders, LLC v. Town of DanvilleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- Scott L. Bach & a. v. New Hampshire Department of SafetySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
- Taylor v. Town of WakefieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
- Commonwealth v. FitzpatrickMassachusetts Superior Court · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.