In Re Detention of Pouncy
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
229 P.3d 678 (2010)
168 Wash.2d 382
In the Matter of the DETENTION OF Curtis N. POUNCY, a/k/a Pouncey, Respondent.
No. 81769-3.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued September 17, 2009.
Decided March 11, 2010.
David J.W. Hackett, King County Prosecutor's Office, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.
Casey Grannis, Christopher Gibson, Nielsen, Broman & Koch, P.L.L.C., Seattle, WA, for Respondent.
STEPHENS, J.
¶ 1 Following trial, a jury found Curtis Pouncy to be a sexually violent predator. Pouncy seeks a new trial, claiming that the trial court erred when it failed to instruct the jury on the definition…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- State v. GuloyWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. IshWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- In re the Detention of CoeWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. FloraCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Badgley Mullins Turner, Pllc App./x-resp. v. Leslie Spencer & Tammy S., Blakey, Resp./x-app.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- State v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 2019
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.