Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. University of Cincinnati Medical Center

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 16, 1997No. 96API05-647PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Petree, Judge.

Plaintiff, Alfred Schmidt, executor of the estate of Barbara Schmidt, deceased, appeals from a judgment of the Court of Claims of Ohio in favor of defendant, University of Cincinnati Medical Center. Plaintiff sets forth the following assignments of error:

1. “The court erred to plaintiffs’ detriment in granting defendant’s Civil Rule 41(B)(1) motion to dismiss against the manifest weight of the evidence.

2. “The court erred to plaintiffs’ detriment in granting defendant’s Civil Rule 41(B)(1) motion to dismiss contrary to law.”

In 1992, decedent Barbara Schmidt was admitted to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bruni v. TatsumiOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Hake v. George Wiedemann Brewing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Ault v. HallOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Soltz v. Colony Recreation CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Oberlin v. FriedmanOhio Supreme Court · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kruzer v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Ealom v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Claims · 2025
  3. Skaggs v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Claims · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API