Howard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
The plaintiff-appellant receiver alleges that claim adjusters and the attorney for State Farm were negligent and acted in bad faith in the handling of the Toomey claim and in their representation of Caren Pfeffer.
When, as here, the insurer undertakes and controls the defense of a claim against its insured, it has a duty not only to protect itself to the extent of its liability but it must act in good faith to protect the interest of its insured. If it fails to do so it is liable to its insured for the amount the insured required over and above the policy limits.
Baker v. Northwestern National…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Baker v. Northwestern National Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Lisowski v. ChenenoffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Kemp v. Wisconsin Electric Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Zimmer v. DaunWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Jahns v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Toy v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Kranzush v. Badger State Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Craig v. Iowa Kemper Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Jones v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Bosco v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.