Legal Opinion

HCFA Associates Corp. v. Grosman

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided March 22, 1997No. CV 96-1332 (ADS)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

SPATT, District Judge.

This lawsuit arises as the result of an agreement entered into between the parties. According to the plaintiffs, HCFA Associates Corporation d/b/a Healthcare Associates (“Healthcare”), B.T.N.H., Inc. (“BTNH”), Patrick Donnellon (“Donnellon”), Harry Satin (“Satin”), Anthony Salerno (“Salerno”) and Jeffrey Sunshine (“Sunshine,” collectively the “plaintiffs”), they were fraudulently induced to execute an agreement (the “Terms Sheet” or the “Agreement”) with the defendant, Kurt Grosman (“Grosman” or the “defendant”), under which the parties…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Goldman v. BeldenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  5. IUE AFL-CIO Pension Fund v. HerrmannCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. P.L.A.Y., Inc. v. Nike, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API