HCFA Associates Corp. v. Grosman
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
This lawsuit arises as the result of an agreement entered into between the parties. According to the plaintiffs, HCFA Associates Corporation d/b/a Healthcare Associates (“Healthcare”), B.T.N.H., Inc. (“BTNH”), Patrick Donnellon (“Donnellon”), Harry Satin (“Satin”), Anthony Salerno (“Salerno”) and Jeffrey Sunshine (“Sunshine,” collectively the “plaintiffs”), they were fraudulently induced to execute an agreement (the “Terms Sheet” or the “Agreement”) with the defendant, Kurt Grosman (“Grosman” or the “defendant”), under which the parties…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Goldman v. BeldenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- IUE AFL-CIO Pension Fund v. HerrmannCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- P.L.A.Y., Inc. v. Nike, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998