Legal Opinion
P.L.A.Y., Inc. v. Nike, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided March 24, 1998No. Civil Action No.97-30055-MAPPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PONSOR, District Judge.
Upon de novo review, this Report and Recommendation is hereby adopted and that portion of Ct. I seeking rescission is hereby dismissed. The settlement agreement is a substituted contract as a matter of law; Ct. I fails to state a claim for rescission. Docket No. 7 is therefore ALLOWED.
So Ordered.
NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), Defendant NIKE, Inc. (“NIKE”) has moved to dismiss a portion of one count of Plaintiff P.L.A.Y., Inc. (“PLAY”)’s five count complaint. The motion has been referred to this Court for a report and…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Emiliano Valencia-CopeteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Park Motor Mart, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Scholz v. GoudreauDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- Cellceutix Corp. v. Nickless (In re Formatech, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
- Barnia v. KaurDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022
- Findability Sciences, Inc. v. Soft10, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023
- Hebert v. Vantage Travel Service, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021