Whitford v. Horn
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Franklin District Cowrt. Mary E. Horn, by her next friend, brought replevin against Whitford, and had judgment, at the March Term 1876 of the district court, for a return of the property replevied, and for costs. Whitford brings the case here. The opinion contains a statement of the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Brewer, J.:
*456statement of facts. *455Action of replevin for a watch. Defense, general denial, and claim that the watch belonged to estate *456of I. Nicklisson, of which defendant was administrator. The testimony is not preserved, and the case is before us upon the pleadings and findings. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, and of this, defendant, as plaintiff in error, now complains. Arid first, he claims that upon the facts found, and admitted by the pleadings, judgment should have been in his favor. We think not. The court finds, that in the…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Jacobs v. JolleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
- Shepard v. ShepardMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Voris v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Matthews v. HoaglandNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1891
- Garrison v. Union Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.