Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Maass

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 7, 1994No. 92C10388; CA A77473PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Petitioner appeals from a judgment denying post-conviction relief. Respondent has moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it presents “no substantial question of law.” ORS 138.660. 1 We agree and allow the motion.

In the post-conviction proceeding, petitioner contended, inter alia, that his trial attorney’s failure to investigate and obtain scientific evidence that would have exonerated him denied him effective representation of counsel. The post- conviction court denied petitioner’s claim and found

‘ ‘by a preponderance of the evidence that in representing the petitioner in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Trujillo v. MaassOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Brock v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  3. Negron v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Short v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. Rodriguez v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API