Bennett v. Maass
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.
Petitioner appeals from a judgment denying post-conviction relief. Respondent has moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it presents “no substantial question of law.” ORS 138.660. 1 We agree and allow the motion.
In the post-conviction proceeding, petitioner contended, inter alia, that his trial attorney’s failure to investigate and obtain scientific evidence that would have exonerated him denied him effective representation of counsel. The post- conviction court denied petitioner’s claim and found
‘ ‘by a preponderance of the evidence that in representing the petitioner in the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Trujillo v. MaassOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Brock v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- Negron v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
3Cited by2 opinions
- Short v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Rodriguez v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003