Legal Opinion

Marion J. Imel v. Laborers Pension Trust Fund for Northern California

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 22, 1990No. 88-15668Published

1Opinion of the Court

904 F.2d 1327

134 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2313, 58 USLW 2717,

115 Lab.Cas. P 10,102,

12 Employee Benefits Ca 1680

Marion J. IMEL, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

LABORERS PENSION TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 88-15668.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Feb. 8, 1990.

Decided May 22, 1990.

Thomas E. Stanton, Stanton, Kay & Watson, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Mark S. Flynn, U.S. Dept. of Labor, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California.

Before CHOY, THOMPSON and…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Ames and Others v. State of Kansas Ex Rel. Johnston. Kansas Pac. Ry Co. v. SameSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Alabama Power Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Monroe v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. McKinney v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API