Legal Opinion

Neil v. Cunningham Store Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 7, 1911PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Pemiscot Circuit Court. — Hon. Henry G. Riley, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDS, P. J. —

Plaintiffs brought their action against defendant, claiming damages in the sum of $584.27, arising out of a breach of contract in the sale by defendant to plaintiffs of two carloads of corn. On a trial of the case before the court, a jury having been waived, there was a finding and judgment in favor of plaintiffs for $126.90. Prom this judgment, plaintiffs in due time appealed to this court. The cause was transferred by us to the Springfield Court of Appeals under the provisions of section 3939, R. S. 1909, and the judgment of the circuit court reversed. Thereafter the cause…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. St. Louis Dressed Beef & Provision Co. v. NixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  2. State ex rel. Dunham v. NixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  3. State ex rel. O'Malley v. NixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  4. Neil v. Cunningham Store Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. King Smith v. Kansas City Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  2. Bartlett & Company, Grain v. The Merchants Company, the Merchants Company v. Bartlett& Company, GrainCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  3. Pratt Grain Co. v. SchreiberMissouri Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. National Warehouse & Storage Co. v. ToomeyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. N. W. Helm Feed & Coal Co. v. Butler County Milling Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API