Legal Opinion
N. W. Helm Feed & Coal Co. v. Butler County Milling Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided March 6, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.
This is an action on account for the contract price and freight on a carload of corn sold by plaintiff to defendant. The defense was that the corn was not of the quality purchased; there was also a counterclaim. On trial in the circuit court the jury found for defendant on plaintiff’s petition and for plaintiff on defendant’s counterclaim. Plaintiff appealed.
The contract for the sale of this corn is evidenced by plaintiff’s Exhibits “A” and “B,” which are as follows:
“May 25, 1922.
“Mr. N. W. Helm, Coal & Peed Co.,
“Caruthersville, Mo.
“Dear Sir:
“Confirming telephone conversation with you today…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pierson v. . CrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Randall v. . Van WagenenNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Bloom's Son Co. v. HaasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
- George Gifford Co. v. John N. WillmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915
- Neil v. Cunningham Store Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bartlett & Company, Grain v. The Merchants Company, the Merchants Company v. Bartlett& Company, GrainCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Baker v. J. C. Watson Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1943
- Lentz v. Evens & Howard Fire Brick Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1928
- Lawson v. M. Longo Fruit Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1926