Legal Opinion

Ashley v. Kinnan

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1888PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action by George B. Ashley, receiver of the Castner Carbon Company, against Alexander P. W. Kinnan, a former director and officer of the corporation.

1Opinion of the CourtPatterson, J.

The plaintiff is the receiver of the Castner Carbon Company, appointed in proceedings for the dissolution of that company, which was a corporation organized under the general manufacturing law of Hew York, and was dissolved by judicial decree in December, 1885. The defendant, during the existence of the corporation, was a director and officer thereof, and the receiver now seeks a recovery against him on two causes of action: (1) For certain moneys which the defendant received as salary as such officer; and (2) for damages for alleged waste of the funds, and improvident management of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Elwood v. . the Western Union Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Gildersleeve v. . LandonNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. McNulty v. . HurdNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  5. Brooklyn Crosstown Railroad Company v. . StrongNew York Court of Appeals · 1878

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Curtin v. Salmon River Hydraulic Gold Mining & Ditch Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
  2. City of Chicago v. Tribune Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Burton v. Lithic Mfg. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API