Legal Opinion

Brooklyn Crosstown Railroad Company v. . Strong

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 12, 1878PublishedCited by 3 opinions

This action was brought against defendant for the alleged fraudulent issue of a certificate for fifty shares of plaintiff’s stock.

Read the full summary

This action was brought against defendant for the alleged fraudulent issue of a certificate for fifty shares of plaintiff’s stock. The complaint alleged in substance, and plaintiff’s evidence tended to show, that defendant was, at the time of the issuing of the stock, a director of the plaintiff and its treasurer ; that plaintiff’s president intending to be absent a short time signed and left with defendant several blank certificates of stock, to be used by him in case any of the stockholders desired to transfer their stock during the absence of the president; that defendant with intent to…

1Opinion of the Court

Hand, J.,

reads for affirmance.

All concur, Miller and Earl, JJ., absent at argument. Judgment affirmed.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mackey v. WebbNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Ashley v. KinnanNew York Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Field v. Truro Cab Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API