Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. Lightner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 22, 1943PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

The second cause of action was properly dismissed. Concededly, this action is identical with that pleaded in the case of Strassburger v. Singer Mfg. Co. (263 App. Div. 518). In the cited case the complaint, which sought a judgment to require this same corporate defendant, a New Jersey corporation, to pay out in dividends part of a large surplus not needed for the business of the corporation, was dismissed by this court. The basis of the ruling in the Strassburger case was that the subject matter involved the internal management of a foreign corporation over which the courts of this State…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cuppy v. . WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Cuppy v. WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  3. Hamm v. Christian Herald Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  4. Strassburger v. Singer Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Broida v. BancroftAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mut. Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  4. North v. RinglingNew York Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Ackert v. AusmanNew York Supreme Court · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API