Legal Opinion

Funding Systems Leasing Corp. v. Diaz

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas

Decided June 3, 1977No. File No. 00572PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDonald T. Dorsey, J.

This is an action for unpaid rent on a lease of electronic equipment. The defendants have appeared specially and pleaded in abatement that the parties to the lease stipulated in paragraph twenty-two therein that any action or proceeding arising under the lease would be litigated only in courts located in New York state. The plaintiff has demurred to the plea on the *100grounds that the stipulation seeks to oust this court of jurisdiction and is against public policy and unenforceable.

Paragraph twenty-two of the lease annexed to the complaint reads as follows:

“stipulation that agreement is a lease…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Central Contracting Co. v. C. E. Youngdahl & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Wm. H. Muller & Co., Inc. v. Swedish American Line Ltd. And Transatlantic Steamship Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  3. Indussa Corporation v. S.S. Ranborg, Her Engines, Boilers, Etc. (Erling Hansens Rederi A/s and Skibs A/s Linea, Claimants)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  4. Krenger v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  5. Parker, Peebles & Knox v. El SaiehSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Manrique v. FabbriSupreme Court of Florida · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API