Legal Opinion

Vane v. Stanley Heating Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 5, 1930No. [No. 51, October Term, 1930.]PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdkins, J.

This appeal is from an order overruling a motion to strike out a judgment entered on a confessed judgment note in which there was a power to enter judgment on the note after maturity thereof “for such amount as may appear to be unpaid thereon.” The note as it appears in the record bears the date of November Ith, 1929. Judgment was entered on March 31st, 1930. The motion to strike out was filed on April 4th, 1930.

The two questions raised by appellant are: (1) Is the note sufficiently complete on its face to serve as a basis for the entry of a judgment on it under the power? (2) Was the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Keiner v. Commerce Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  2. International Harvester Co. v. NeuhauserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
  3. Linthicum v. BagbyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
  4. Wisner v. ReesideCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
  5. Automobile Brokerage Corp. v. MyerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bolotin v. SelisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. Klupt v. Bar Ass'n of Balto. CityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API