Linthicum v. Bagby
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Baltimore City. (Sober, C. J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtUrner, J.
The essential question in this case is whether there is legally sufficient evidence to support- the theory that notice of dishonor of the promissory notes in suit was impliedly waived by the indorser.
The notes sued on are four in number and the total of the balances of principal and interest they represent is $6,832.27. They were the last in their respective series of many renewal notes given in the course and settlement of the maker’s transactions, as a poultry merchant, in the purchase of supplies from the plaintiff firm through a period of fifteen years. For the current indebtedness…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Burrows v. KlunkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
- M. Schwartz & Sons v. WilmerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
- Seldner v. Mount Jackson National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1887
3Cited by17 opinions
- Simpson v. First Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1919
- Anderson v. LaddTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- Republic National Bank of Dallas v. StrealyTexas Supreme Court · 1961
- Leonard v. Union Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
- Foundry Manufacturing Co. v. FarrSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.